Timecop V2 vs Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner Comparison
See a side-by-side comparison of ingredients, stats, and community sentiment.

Timecop V2
apollon nutrition

Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner
psycho pharma
Compare
Timecop V2
Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner
Stimulants
Total Caffeine
500 mg
163 mg
Exotic Stimulants
Contains Yohimbe
Community
Community Approval
46%
92%
Total Mentions
13
13
Where to Buy Timecop V2
NutriCartel
$69.95
Where to Buy Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner

Timecop V2
apollon nutrition
View Details →Caffeine
500 mg
Exotic Stims
No
Contains Yohimbe
Yes
Community Approval
46%
Mentions
13
Where to Buy
NutriCartel
$69.95
Pros
- Timecop V2 is considered a top-tier pre-workout by some users.
- Some users find its taste surprisingly delicious, comparing it to candy.
- It provides a strong and enjoyable feeling, even with a full serving.
- Users report long-lasting positive effects, potentially for 5-6 hours.
- It is recommended by some, with the option to use a half scoop for daily consumption.
Cons
- A drawback of Timecop V2 is its overwhelmingly negative taste profile, described by many as horrible, difficult to drink, and even 'Satan's Anus'.
- Several users consider it the worst-tasting supplement or pre-workout they have ever tried.
- Some users have had generally negative experiences with all Timecop versions they've tried.

Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner
psycho pharma
View Details →Caffeine
163 mg
Exotic Stims
No
Contains Yohimbe
Yes
Community Approval
92%
Mentions
13
Where to Buy
Pros
- Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner delivers an intense stimulant experience, providing significant energy, focus, and mood elevation, often described as euphoric.
- It is highly praised for its potent effects, with users noting it "hits way harder and better" than many alternatives.
- The supplement is effective for enhancing cardio sessions, promoting sweating and a strong "energy & buzz."
- Many users report an "insane experience" at higher doses, with effects building over an hour and providing an "unwavering drive."
- It can be successfully stacked with other products to amplify workout performance and cognitive benefits.
Cons
- A drawback of Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner is its strong stimulant blend, particularly the yohimbine content, which can lead to overwhelming or negative experiences for those unfamiliar with or sensitive to such powerful ingredients.
- Some users initially found the effects "weaker than I thought," indicating that finding the optimal dosage or stacking strategy may be necessary for desired results.
Comparison Summary
Timecop V2 is a high-caffeine pre-workout with 500mg of caffeine, while Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner is a fat burner with 163mg of caffeine. Timecop V2 is noted for its extremely poor taste, whereas Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner's main drawback is its potent stimulant blend which can be overwhelming for some. Timecop V2 targets users seeking an intense, long-lasting pre-workout experience despite taste, while Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner is for individuals looking for a potent stimulant-driven fat burner with significant energy and focus.
Key Differences:
- Product Type: Timecop V2 (Pre-workout) vs Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner (Fat burner)
- Caffeine Content: Timecop V2 (500 mg) vs Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner (163 mg)
- Primary User Concern: Timecop V2 (Overwhelmingly negative taste profile, described as horrible and difficult to drink.) vs Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner (Strong stimulant blend, particularly yohimbine, which can lead to overwhelming experiences for sensitive users.)
- User Sentiment: Timecop V2 (46%) vs Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner (92%)
Key Similarities:
- Exotic Stimulants: Neither Timecop V2 nor Far Beyond Driven Fat Burner contain exotic stimulants.
- Potent Effects: Both products are described by users as providing strong, intense, and long-lasting effects, delivering significant energy and focus.