Wild Fire vs Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml Comparison
See a side-by-side comparison of ingredients, stats, and community sentiment.
Wild Fire
socal supps
Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml
cellucor
Compare
Wild Fire
Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml
Basic Info
Brand
socal supps
cellucor
Product Image
Stimulants
Total Caffeine
350 mg
0 mg
Exotic Stimulants
Contains Yohimbe
Community
Community Approval
89%
46%
Total Mentions
97
26
Where to Buy Wild Fire
Ruesco
Ships from:🇺🇸 United States
$3.00
In Stock
Updated 8h ago
Muscle Factory SC
Ships from:🇺🇸 United States
$52.99
Out of Stock
Updated 10h ago
NutriCartel
Ships from:🇺🇸 United States
$54.99
In Stock
Updated 9h ago
Where to Buy Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml
CN Sport
Ships from:🇬🇧 United Kingdom
£2.00
In Stock
Updated 89d ago
Wild Fire
socal supps
View Details →Caffeine
350 mg
Exotic Stims
Yes
Contains Yohimbe
No
Community Approval
89%
Mentions
97
Where to Buy
Ruesco
Ships from:🇺🇸 United States
$3.00
In Stock
Updated 8h ago
Muscle Factory SC
Ships from:🇺🇸 United States
$52.99
Out of Stock
Updated 10h ago
NutriCartel
Ships from:🇺🇸 United States
$54.99
In Stock
Updated 9h ago
Pros
- Wild Fire delivers strong energy and focus, with users reporting a positive mindset and effective workouts.
- Contains a comprehensive blend of stimulants like DMAA, DMHA, and Caffeine for an intense experience.
- Includes ingredients such as L-Citrulline, Beta Alanine, and Agmatine, which support pump and endurance.
- Praised by some users as a 'forgotten gem' and a favorite pre-workout for its strong 'hit'.
Cons
- A drawback of Wild Fire is that some users find it ineffective or 'bunk,' with concerns about inconsistent batches being 'watered down.'
- There are reports of formula changes, with some users noting a difference from previous versions and missing 'special ingredients.'
- Some users found the effects to be 'meh' or not as impactful compared to other pre-workouts they have tried.
- The duration of its effects might not last all day for some individuals.
Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml
cellucor
View Details →Caffeine
0 mg
Exotic Stims
No
Contains Yohimbe
No
Community Approval
46%
Mentions
26
Where to Buy
CN Sport
Ships from:🇬🇧 United Kingdom
£2.00
In Stock
Updated 89d ago
Pros
-
- C4 Can - 500ml delivers performance fuel and is specifically designed for a pump effect, being a non-stimulant option.
- It is often recommended as a good starting point for those new to pre-workouts or looking for lighter options.
- Some users find its taste appealing.
- It is sometimes listed among recommended pre-workouts by certain users.
Cons
- A drawback of - C4 Can - 500ml is that many users consider its ingredient profile to be subpar or lacking in potency.
- A significant number of users perceive it as ineffective, with some claiming it has declined in quality over the past decade.
- It is frequently criticized for being overhyped and not delivering on its promises.
- Some feedback suggests it may be overpriced for its perceived value, relying on marketing gimmicks.
Comparison Summary
Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml is a stimulant-free pre-workout focused on pump effects, while Wild Fire is a high-stimulant formula containing 350 mg of caffeine and exotic stimulants like DMAA and DMHA. Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml targets users new to pre-workouts or those avoiding stimulants, whereas Wild Fire is for experienced users seeking intense energy, focus, and a strong 'hit'.
Key Differences:
- Stimulant Content: Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml (0 mg caffeine, no exotic stimulants) vs Wild Fire (350 mg caffeine, includes exotic stimulants (DMAA, DMHA))
- Primary User Experience: Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml (Non-stimulant performance fuel, pump effect, often recommended for beginners or lighter options) vs Wild Fire (Strong energy, focus, positive mindset, intense experience, praised for a strong 'hit')
- User Sentiment: Cellucor - C4 Can - 500ml (46%) vs Wild Fire (88%)
Key Similarities:
- Workout Enhancement Goals: Both products aim to enhance workout performance, with specific mentions of supporting muscle pump and overall performance fuel.
- User Feedback on Effectiveness: Both products have received some user feedback indicating perceived ineffectiveness or concerns about quality/consistency, though for different reasons and to varying degrees.