Timecop V2 vs Crack Primal Comparison
See a side-by-side comparison of ingredients, stats, and community sentiment.

Timecop V2
apollon nutrition

Crack Primal
dark labs
Timecop V2
Crack Primal
Where to Buy Timecop V2
NutriCartel
Where to Buy Crack Primal
Ruesco
Cross The Limits
CN Sport
Where to Buy
NutriCartel
Where to Buy
Ruesco
Cross The Limits
CN Sport
Ingredient Label
Ingredient Label
Pros
- Timecop V2 is considered a top-tier pre-workout by some users.
- Some users find its taste surprisingly delicious, comparing it to candy.
- It provides a strong and enjoyable feeling, even with a full serving.
- Users report long-lasting positive effects, potentially for 5-6 hours.
- It is recommended by some, with the option to use a half scoop for daily consumption.
Cons
- A drawback of Timecop V2 is its overwhelmingly negative taste profile, described by many as horrible, difficult to drink, and even 'Satan's Anus'.
- Several users consider it the worst-tasting supplement or pre-workout they have ever tried.
- Some users have had generally negative experiences with all Timecop versions they've tried.
Pros
- Crack Primal delivers an extreme and powerful energy boost, often described as 'hitting hard' and providing 'urgent energy.'
- Users report significant mood elevation and clear-headed focus, contributing to a 'super smooth' and effective training experience.
- It is praised for its strong effects, with users frequently calling it '๐ฅ' and '100% ๐ฅ'.
- Some users find the taste acceptable, noting it 'donโt even taste that bad'.
- The formula includes a comprehensive blend of stimulants and performance enhancers, such as L-Citrulline Malate, Beta Alanine, and various caffeine sources.
Cons
- A drawback of Crack Primal is the lack of direct negative feedback in the provided user comments, making it difficult to identify specific product flaws from this data.
- Given its 'Extreme' intensity level and high stimulant load, it may not be suitable for individuals sensitive to stimulants or those new to pre-workout supplements.
- The manufacturer description was not provided, limiting official product information about its intended use or specific benefits.
Comparison Summary
Apollon Nutrition's Timecop V2 contains a very high 500mg of caffeine without exotic stimulants, while Dark Labs' Crack Primal has 206mg of caffeine and includes exotic stimulants, delivering an extreme energy boost. Timecop V2 is praised for its strong, long-lasting effects despite overwhelmingly negative taste feedback, whereas Crack Primal is lauded for its powerful energy, mood elevation, and acceptable taste. Timecop V2 targets experienced users seeking a potent, long-lasting energy experience who can tolerate poor taste, while Crack Primal is for advanced users desiring an intense, smooth, and focused high-stimulant workout.
Key Differences:
- Caffeine Content: Timecop V2 (500 mg) vs Crack Primal (206 mg)
- Exotic Stimulants: Timecop V2 (No) vs Crack Primal (Yes)
- User Feedback on Taste: Timecop V2 (Overwhelmingly negative, described as horrible and difficult to drink, even 'Satan's Anus'.) vs Crack Primal (Generally acceptable, with some users noting it 'donโt even taste that bad'.)
- Primary Energy Profile: Timecop V2 (Provides a strong and enjoyable feeling with long-lasting positive effects, potentially for 5-6 hours.) vs Crack Primal (Delivers an extreme and powerful energy boost, often described as 'hitting hard' and providing 'urgent energy' with significant mood elevation and clear-headed focus.)
- Nature of User Cons: Timecop V2 (Primarily focused on extremely negative taste experiences, considered by many as the worst-tasting supplement.) vs Crack Primal (Lack of direct negative feedback, with potential suitability concerns for individuals sensitive to stimulants or new to pre-workouts.)
- User Sentiment: Timecop V2 (56%) vs Crack Primal (91%)
Key Similarities:
- Potent Pre-Workout Experience: Both Apollon Nutrition's Timecop V2 and Dark Labs' Crack Primal are described by users as providing a very strong and intense pre-workout experience.
- Effective Performance Enhancement: Users report that both products are highly effective in delivering their intended pre-workout benefits, such as energy and focus, contributing to effective training sessions.